data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98480/98480d631ce7967029d743d21f4aa0c3160fff40" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e17db/e17db5fe1c4b8f70fdd886a83399c1b85e66a2a7" alt=""
As always when I report on renewal rates, I add the disclaimer that comparing renewal rates is a challenge because there are many variables from association to association including business rules, dues amounts, and marketing environments.
Membership marketing – acquiring, engaging, upgrading, and renewing members – is the cornerstone for associations and relationship driven organizations. Whether you are an association professional or a relationship marketer, join the discussion on the Membership Marketing Blog and share your ideas and counsel.
4 comments:
Tony - Thanks for posting this. I just put together some retention analysis that I am sharing at a Council retreat in two weeks. This will be great to have as a back-up to measure us against industry averages.
Tony, thank you for adding your caveat to this post. As I've written here (http://tinyurl.com/EDMRetention), the question of retention rates, and how one association compares to another, really grates on me. Too often I think it's a crutch for mediocre performance (i.e., "Well, our retention is actually higher than average for associations our size, so we can just keep doing what we're doing.").
Wes – Thanks for the reminder. Readers who want to know more about the challenges of comparing renewal rates between associations can look at my post "No Good or Bad Renewal Rates". I list a number of the challenges involved in this type of comparison there.
http://membershipmarketing.blogspot.com/2007/11/no-good-or-bad-renewal-rates.html
Tony
Darryl -- Thanks for the feedback. You should be able to click on the charts and save any of them that would be of help for the meeting. I know that you are already aware of this, but also note Wes's and my comments here. Tony
Post a Comment