One of the most important numbers to get right in membership
marketing is the proper calculation of an association’s renewal rate. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon as I meet with
associations to find their renewal calculation incorrect. I think the confusion stems from getting lost
in the trees instead of starting out looking at the forest.
Let me explain. In
very simple terms, an organization’s renewal rate calculates how many members
remained with the organization from twelve months earlier. To get these numbers, you first need to know
how many members you had at the beginning of the period. Next you need to know how many members you
have now. Then to determine how many continued
their membership over the past year, you subtract the total number of new
members from your current membership (new members were not eligible to
renew). This gives you the count for how
many members your organization retained.
Here is an example.
Let’s say you had 10,000 members on March 1, 2017. And twelve months later you also have 10,000
members. But of the current 10,000
members, 2,500 were added as new members over the course of the year. That means your net continuing members were
7,500. And if 7,500 of your original
10,000 members continued with you, you have a 75% renewal rate.
So that is looking at the big picture – the forest. But what happens if your computer report
gives you a different number? This
discrepancy typically comes because of the business rules that were used to set
up the database report.
Here are a couple of common problems. One is how reinstated members (those who pay
dues after the grace period has ended) are counted as either new or renewing. With an anniversary date system, I recommend
that late payers who are given a new expiration date should be counted as a “new”
member and not be included as a continuing member. With the example above, if 500 reinstated
members were removed from the continuing membership number and were now counted as new
members, the new member count would be 3,000, pushing your renewal rate down to
70%.
The other common problem is where Life Members or multi-year
members are counted. They continued
their membership, so in the example above, they would be counted as renewing members
even though there was not a separate financial transaction. Essentially, this
method means that the terms renewal and retention can be used interchangeably.
The bottom line is when you are attempting to calculate your
renewal rate, start out with the big picture.
Do the simple math first then if reports come out of your database that
do not corroborate the simple math, look into what business rules have been
factored into your report. Once the
aggregate renewal rate is established, then a month by month rate can be calculated
using the same method with the exception that the count of renewing members
should continue to be updated until the grace period for that expiration month comes to an
end.
The goal is to get an accurate renewal calculation where
your math and the database report synchronize.
Ultimately, the economics of membership and calculating lifetime value,
maximum acquisition cost, and steady state calculations depend on an accurate
renewal rate.
No comments:
Post a Comment