One of the most common reasons associations fail to grow is not a lack of ideas, creativity, or even resources. It is hesitation.
Over the years, I have watched promising membership
initiatives lose momentum because organizations kept studying and refining their plans rather than launching them in the marketplace.
A theme I have emphasized in each of my books, including Membership Recruitment, The Seven Deadly Sins of Membership Marketing, and the
just-published Membership Marketing from A to Z, is a bias toward action
rather than continual analysis.
Over the years, I have sat through many meetings where the
momentum behind a marketing initiative was quietly halted by comments such as
“We need more research,” “Our AMS is not quite ready,” or “Let’s revisit once
we have more feedback.” While thoughtful planning matters, organizations can
easily fall into what I call the paralysis of analysis. This tendency to
overthink marketing efforts can delay implementation or even lead to
abandonment.
The irony is that marketing is one of the few disciplines
in which the marketplace often provides the best answers.
Several years ago, I received an RFP from an association
facing declining membership. Their objective was understandable: stop the
decline and rebuild growth. However, the process they outlined was exhaustive.
First, they wanted research to redefine their value proposition. Then, case
studies of comparable organizations. Then, benchmarking. Then, an evaluation of
staff and departmental structure. Finally, they wanted multiple strategic
scenarios developed before any membership recruitment began. The proposed
timeline ranged from six months to a year.
The challenge was that the perfect can be the enemy of the
good. By the time planning was complete, the market would likely have shifted
again. Associations, like any business, rarely have the luxury of waiting for
certainty. Conditions change too quickly. Member expectations evolve.
Competitors advance.
Instead of recommending a long planning cycle for this
association, we proposed an alternative approach using a Ready, Fire, Aim
model. The traditional phrase, of course, is “Ready, Aim, Fire.” In marketing
and sales, however, I believe the order should be reversed.
Planning matters. Organizations need a clear value
proposition, target audiences, goals, and a workable strategy. However, sooner rather
than later, learning must give way to action. That is where the Ready, Fire,
Aim philosophy proves powerful. The concept is straightforward.
·
Ready means getting started with a focused strategy.
Drop the 30-page strategy document. Create a one- or two-page action plan.
·
Fire means launching the effort. Send the email.
Test the offer. Make the calls. Reach out to prospects.
·
Aim means learning from the test results. Track responses.
Identify what worked. Refine the strategy. Try again.
Instead of trying to answer every question in advance,
organizations let the marketplace guide them. The marketplace, though sometimes
brutally honest, can be an exceptionally effective teacher.
Several years ago, I spoke with an organization that held
nearly 100,000 prospect email addresses collected through website
registrations. Yet they hesitated to market to these prospects because they
worried they did not yet have the perfect message or fully refined services.
Research certainly has value, but there will always be another question to
answer and another layer of uncertainty to explore.
My recommendation was that, rather than waiting for
certainty, the association could segment the prospect list, create several
message variations, and test them in the marketplace. In a short period of
time, they would learn which messages resonated, which segments responded, and
whether the opportunity warranted deeper investment. The resulting feedback
would almost certainly provide more practical insight than months of internal
discussion.
The same principle applies across the membership lifecycle.
Associations can test digital advertising with new market segments, experiment
with onboarding approaches, test different renewal messages, and pilot
campaigns to recently lapsed members. Some efforts may underperform and be
discontinued quickly, while others may reveal substantial untapped
opportunities. Either outcome is valuable because it replaces speculation with
evidence.
This tendency to delay action is not unique to associations.
I have seen sales professionals spend weeks refining presentations, organizing
CRM systems, tweaking messages, building prospect lists, or upgrading
technology without ever making a sales call. Preparation feels productive
because it is comfortable, while selling feels risky because it invites
rejection. Yet results come only through engagement with the marketplace.
None of this is an argument against planning or research.
Effective marketing absolutely requires both. But research can feel like
peeling an onion, with another layer of uncertainty to explore. At some point,
understanding must give way to execution. Indeed, one of the most valuable
forms of market research is surprisingly simple. Will someone say yes? Will
they join? Will they renew? Will they respond? Will they buy? Those answers
come only through action.
The organizations that succeed are rarely the ones with the perfect plan. More often than not, they are the ones willing to move, learn, and adapt. In marketing, progress tends to favor those who embrace a simple philosophy: Ready. Fire. Aim.


No comments:
Post a Comment